Transphoto
A fényképeket változtatás nélkül közöljük és nem szándékozunk velük bármilyen politikai vagy világnézeti álláspontot képviselni.

Mindent a felhasználók küldenek be, és nem tükrözik az oldal szerkesztőinek véleményét.

Bezár
Budapest, BKVT D (Schlick) — 490; Budapest — Régi fényképek
  Budapest BKVT D (Schlick) — 490 
Régi fényképek
Baross tér
Photo: Fortepan

Feltöltötte bandrew · Miskolc           Dátum: 1903 .

Statisztikák

Publikálva 09.12.2013 16:40 UTC
Megtekintések — 607

Részletes adatok

Budapest, BKVT D (Schlick) — 490

Hely:Korábbi társaságok
Kocsiszín/üzem:P.K.V.T. / BKVT
kezdete:1899
típus:BKVT D (Schlick)
Gyártási év:1899
Aktuális állapot:Átépítve vagy modernizálva (1905) Selejtezve
Üzemmód:Forgalmi
Megjegyzés:1905 to BKVT Q; 1923 to BEVV / BSzKRt., 1369; 1949 to FVV, 1334; 1950 to 1404; 1959 to Debrecen, 91
1950 to twin car 1404+1405 (Budapest) -> 91+92 (Debrecen)

Kommentek · 6

09.12.2013 17:26 UTC
Link
AlexSan · Odessza
Képek: 536
Interesting post(?) car near the monument.
+1
+1 / –0
10.12.2013 01:39 UTC
Link
A. N. · Almati
Képek: 2035
But where is the overhead wire?
0
+0 / –0
10.12.2013 01:47 UTC
Link
Képek: 3000
Цитата (A. N., 10.12.2013):
> But where is the overhead wire?

Right rails have a gutter for conduit (third rail)?..
0
+0 / –0
10.12.2013 07:12 UTC
Link
A. N. · Almati
Képek: 2035
But the bow for overhead wire is clearly seen on the roof. http://transphoto.ru/photo/646649/ - the same for this photo. Still unclear how these cars are powered here.
0
+0 / –0
10.12.2013 07:22 UTC
Link
Képek: 3000
No-no, conduit was in Budapest!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conduit_current_collection:

> Other European hybrid tramway networks included Paris, Nice, Lyon, Lille and Bordeaux in France; Berlin, Vienna and Budapest. In Paris, the conduit sections were frequently very short, requiring cars to change from overhead to conduit and back several times in one journey. The last conduit line in Paris closed in 1936, while the last Bordeaux conduit car ran in 1953. The conduit systems in Berlin, Vienna and Budapest were very short-lived. All three were replaced by overhead working before World War I.

http://hampage.hu/trams/muzeum/e_index.html:

> The small exhibits are also very interesting. To the left we see a cutaway of the Budapest electric tram conduit system designed by Siemens&Halske in the late 1880s. In contrast to other conduit systems, IT WAS LOCATED UNDERNEATH ONE OF THE RUNNING RAILS, and not between the two rails of the track. Also, unlike in Vienna, where they used an improved version of the Budapest conduit with the running rails used for current return, both positive and negative electric poles were located in the shaft, by using two angle-irons, one for each pole. To the right we see different current collectors for this system, which proved to be problematic at the start, as the current collector could only be raised (removed) at designated places. Later they introduced more flexible current collecting "ships", which could be raised anytime, anywhere.

You can see conduit photos from museum by last link.
And I was right about gutter for conduit :)
+1
+1 / –0
10.12.2013 07:35 UTC
Link
A. N. · Almati
Képek: 2035
So I guess the explanation given by Aviateur is right. My first thought was about retouch, too, but there are even no proper poles for overhead wire here. Thanks everyone.
0
+0 / –0

Megjegyzésed

Ne vitatkozz(on) politikai témákról - azért egy hónap tiltás jár!
Kommenteléshez be kell jelentkezni.