TransPhoto

Nuotraukos publikuojamos tinklapyje „kaip yra“ ir neturi tikslo platinti bet kurias politines ir/ar ideologines pažiūras.

Turinys yra pateikiamas tinklapio vartotojų ir neatspindi tinklapio administracijos požiūrio.

Uždaryti
Grudziondzas, Konstal 2N nr. 36
  GrudziondzasKonstal 2N nr. 36 
Zajezdnia tramwajowa

Autorius: focus1965 · Antwerpen           Data: 2024 m. rugpjūčio 5 d., pirmadienis

Parodyti fotografavimo vietą žemėlapyje

Statistika

Licenzija: Copyright ©
Publikuota 21.08.2024 16:23 UTC
Peržiūrų — 216

Detali informacija

Grudziondzas, Konstal 2N nr. 36

Depas/Parkas:Miejski Zakład Komunikacji sp. z o.o.
Nuo...:1994
Modelis:Konstal 2N
Pagamintas:1992
Dabartinė būsena:Eksploatuojamas
Paskirtis:Tarnybinis
Pastaba:1994 ex Bydgoszcz, 450

Nuotraukos parametrai

Model:Canon EOS 80D
Date and Time:05.08.2024 13:49
Exposure Time:1/250 sec
Aperture Value:9
ISO Speed:160
Focal Length:50 mm
Parodyti visą EXIF

Komentarai · 3

24.08.2024 23:01 UTC
Nuoroda
Tramwajooo · Pabianice
Foto: 336
They didn't mind you taking pictures? Because if nothing has changed (I was in Grudziądz 12.07.2024), there are signs with prohibiting photography.
0
+0 / –0
25.08.2024 14:43 UTC
Nuoroda
focus1965 · Antwerpen
Foto: 8492 · Administratoriaus pavaduotojas / Tinklapio vertimas (EN/FR)
Quote (Tramwajooo, 25.08.2024):
> there are signs with prohibiting photography

Indeed, I saw a sign on the administrative building with blinded windows. Of course, I did not photograph that sign.
Otherwise and to my knowledge, I didn't break any law by photographing an old tram depot with an almost equally old tram - from the street and without entering the private grounds.
I can also put such a sign in front of my house. Question is what I can do if someone would take a picture, from that sign or my house...
0
+0 / –0
13.09.2024 07:24 UTC
Nuoroda
Ymtram · East Haven - Branford
Foto: 20000 · Neautorinių publikacijų tvarkytojas / Nuotraukų tvarkytojas / Bendrasis redaktorius / Naujienų redaktorius / Tinklapio vertimas (EN)
Generally the Western 'school of law' (and most certainly the English 'school of law') attributes permissiveness of photography with where the photo is taken from, e.g. whether the photographer is standing on a 'free' public ground, or on a private ground where access rights or conditions of conduct can be restricted by that private party. Thus photography permissiveness is not associated with the subject of photography itself. That is, if a photo of a nuclear submarine is taken through a hole in a fence of a military base, while the photographer was standing on public land outside the fence - it is perfectly legal.

Some question such approach, but it is definitely the clearest and most obvious way to sort out legal issues related to photography. For one thing, it is not possible to post the 'no photo' signs on all objects where photos are unwanted. Thus often confusion and misunderstanding exists in the 'East' (pardon my generalization), where photography rights are associated with the subject / object of the photo, when some obscure rules about photography exist, but there is no way the photographer can know about them. You often find out about the rules when the militia or security approach you, and it is already too late :( While in the 'West' the laws are immediately clear through land attribution of the ground the photo was taken from.

And yes, I also remember that strange sign in Grudziądz :)
+1
+1 / –0

Komentaras

Už politikos aptarimą yra skiriamas mažiausiai 1 mėnesio pašalinimas
Jūs neprisijungėte.
Komentuoti gali tik registruoti vartotojai.