Transphoto
照片中反映的内容为事实而且目的并非为推广任何站点;所有资料由用户提交而且不能代表网站的任何政治站点。
关闭
列日, CAF Urbos 100 # 5101 (1); 列日, CAF Urbos 100 # 5114; 列日 — Tramway Line and Infrastructure Construction
  列日 CAF Urbos 100 # 5101 (1) 
 CAF Urbos 100 # 5114 
Tramway Line and Infrastructure Construction
Centre de Maintenance et de Réparation (Bressoux)

作者: Ymtram · 东黑文-布兰福德           日期: 26 五月 2024 年, 星期天

展示拍摄地点

照片数据

发布 04.06.2024 01:47 UTC
观看 — 380

详细信息

列日, CAF Urbos 100 # 5101

运营商/停车场:T.E.C.
副号:1
从...:2023
型号:CAF Urbos 100
制造日期:2021
运营状态:未批准运营
用处:载客车辆

列日, CAF Urbos 100 # 5114

运营商/停车场:T.E.C.
型号:CAF Urbos 100
制造日期:2021
运营状态:未批准运营
用处:载客车辆

EXIF

Model:Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Artist Name:ymtram
Date and Time:26.05.2024 18:13
Exposure Time:1/200 sec
Aperture Value:5.6
ISO Speed:800
Exposure Bias:–1/3 EV
Focal Length:38.741 mm
展示完整EXIF

评论 · 7

04.06.2024 09:23 UTC
链接
Ymtram · 东黑文-布兰福德
照片:: 20000 · 第三方照片审查员 / 照片审查员 / 综合编辑人员 / 新闻编辑人员 / 页面翻译 (EN)
The fleet number of the tram on the left is clearly 1.
• • •
Парковый номер вагона слева четко виден как номер 1.
+1
+1 / –0
04.06.2024 20:08 UTC
链接
focus1965 · 安特衛普
照片:: 8504 · 副管理员 / 页面翻译 (EN/FR)
Quote (Ymtram, 04.06.2024):
> The fleet number of the tram on the left is clearly 1.

And wrong. 3 numbers are missing, or stolen, or whatever...
+3
+3 / –0
04.06.2024 23:13 UTC
链接
Ymtram · 东黑文-布兰福德
照片:: 20000 · 第三方照片审查员 / 照片审查员 / 综合编辑人员 / 新闻编辑人员 / 页面翻译 (EN)
Цитата (focus1965, 04.06.2024):
> 3 numbers are missing, or stolen, or whatever...

I agree that the number 1 is probably wrong, and there is another official fleet number exists. However, I felt such numbering might had been preserved intentionally for marketing / promotional consideration, e.g. to emphasize this is 'the first tram ever' etc. It would be curios to see if the number '1' will be retained for the opening ceremonies.

> 3 номера отвалились, или украдены, или что там еще...

Согласен, что цифра 1, вероятно, неправильная, и существует другой официальный номер вагона. Однако, я подозреваю, что такой номер мог быть присвоен намеренно для маркетинговых / рекламных соображений, например, чтобы подчеркнуть, что это именно "первый трамвай сети" и т.п. Было бы интересно посмотреть, сохранится ли номер "1" к церемонии открытия сети.
0
+0 / –0
08.06.2024 15:30 UTC
链接
focus1965 · 安特衛普
照片:: 8504 · 副管理员 / 页面翻译 (EN/FR)
Quote (Ymtram, 05.06.2024):
> I agree that the number 1 is probably wrong, and there is another official fleet number exists. However, I felt such numbering might had been preserved intentionally for marketing / promotional consideration, e.g. to emphasize this is 'the first tram ever' etc. It would be curios to see if the number '1' will be retained for the opening ceremonies.

The tram was delivered with the complete number.
You can check all the press releases (letram.be): no mention about the first tram (as 1). Let's see if this tram will run on tests or by the opening with this number. BTW: I don't think you could see every side (incl. inside) of this tram.
0
+0 / –0
22.06.2024 14:40 UTC
链接
focus1965 · 安特衛普
照片:: 8504 · 副管理员 / 页面翻译 (EN/FR)
I found in a magazine a photo of this tram (on a test run) with remark "1 aka 5101". I merge both profiles.
+1
+1 / –0
22.06.2024 15:56 UTC
链接
Ymtram · 东黑文-布兰福德
照片:: 20000 · 第三方照片审查员 / 照片审查员 / 综合编辑人员 / 新闻编辑人员 / 页面翻译 (EN)
Цитата (focus1965, 22.06.2024):
> "1 aka 5101"

This was exactly my suspicion, especially since 5101 is the very first number in the fleet (but curiously not the first tram that was delivered). Let's see if the number '1' will be used for presentation purposes through the opening ceremonies.

What is known about 5102-5106? The fleet roster is incomplete.
+1
+1 / –0
22.06.2024 19:26 UTC
链接
focus1965 · 安特衛普
照片:: 8504 · 副管理员 / 页面翻译 (EN/FR)
Quote (Ymtram, 22.06.2024):
> What is known about 5102-5106? The fleet roster is incomplete.

The problem in Liège is exactly the same as in Antwerp. Not coincidentally: the trams come from the same factory.
They are delivered randomly and therefore not in numerical order.
Moreover, in Antwerp, deliveries take place during the night.
In the beginning (with the first ones), there are still local enthusiasts who are present, but afterwards the interest gradually fades.
Official data doesn't exist, or is not shared, or simply kept secret.
For both Antwerp and Liège, one can reasonably assume that all, or most of the trams, have been delivered, but precisely this difference makes it impossible to keep the database correctly updated without guessing.
+2
+2 / –0

你的评论

请勿讨论政治话题;封禁时期≥1月
登录的用户才能写评论.